RateCaptain
  • Home
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
  • FX Rates
  • Money Market
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Commodities
  • Corporates
No Result
View All Result
Subscribe
  • Home
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
  • FX Rates
  • Money Market
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Commodities
  • Corporates
No Result
View All Result
RateCaptain
No Result
View All Result
Home Economy

Agip Oil Triumphs as Appeal Court Dismisses Malabu Oil’s $1.3 Billion OPL 245 Suit

Stephen Akudike by Stephen Akudike
May 29, 2025
in Economy
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
0
NGX Fines Banks N76.8 Million for Late Financial Reporting
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsappShare on Telegram

On May 27, 2025, the Court of Appeal in Abuja dismissed Malabu Oil and Gas Ltd’s $1.3 billion claim over Oil Prospecting Licence (OPL) 245, ruling in favor of Nigerian Agip Oil Company. The decision, delivered by Justice H. A. Barka on May 23, 2025, overturned a 2020 Federal High Court ruling that had rejected Agip’s preliminary objection, labeling Malabu’s suit an “abuse of court process.” This marks a significant development in the long-standing dispute over OPL 245, a deep-water oilfield 150 km off the Niger Delta.

The legal battle stems from a 2011 “Block 245 Resolution Agreement,” under which Malabu allegedly relinquished its rights to OPL 245. On May 11, 2011, the Federal Government reallocated the block to Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Ltd and Nigerian Agip Exploration Ltd, pursuant to the Petroleum Act. Malabu challenged this, claiming its prior allocation remained valid and seeking to nullify the reallocation. Agip, represented by Babatunde Fagbohunlu SAN, argued that Malabu’s suit was statute-barred, filed over five years after the allocation, and constituted an abuse of process due to a concurrent case questioning Malabu’s shareholder legitimacy.

AlsoRead

Nigeria Posts N5.17 Trillion Trade Surplus in Q1 2025

Private Sector Demands Refinery Privatization After $2.4bn Repair Failure

Finance Ministry Denies Collapse of $5 Billion Oil-Backed Loan Deal

The Federal High Court’s 2020 dismissal of Agip’s objection prompted an appeal. Agip contended that the lower court’s failure to address its jurisdictional challenges violated its right to a fair hearing. The Appeal Court agreed, dismissing Malabu’s claims against Agip, the federal government, the Minister of Petroleum Resources, Shell entities, and Chief Dan Etete. At the current exchange rate of N1,579/$1 as of May 28, 2025, the disputed $1.3 billion equates to approximately N2.05 trillion, highlighting the financial stakes of OPL 245, one of Nigeria’s most contested oil assets.

The ruling reinforces the 2011 reallocation and underscores judicial scrutiny of overlapping legal actions. However, Malabu may pursue further appeals, prolonging the saga. The decision strengthens Agip and Shell’s operational control over OPL 245, potentially boosting investor confidence in Nigeria’s oil sector, though unresolved disputes and regulatory uncertainties could temper optimism.

Tags: AGIP
Previous Post

NELFUND Disburses N56.85 Billion in Student Loans to 298,124 Beneficiaries in First Year

Next Post

Implications of Declining Aid and Remittances for Low-Income African Nations

Related News

States and Local Governments Witness a 27.62% Increase in Revenue Amid Economic Hardship.

Nigeria Posts N5.17 Trillion Trade Surplus in Q1 2025

by Rate Captain
June 12, 2025
0

Nigeria recorded a significant trade surplus of N5.17 trillion in the first quarter of 2025 (Q1’25), marking a 52% increase...

NMDPRA inaugurates oil and gas industry service permit portal.

Private Sector Demands Refinery Privatization After $2.4bn Repair Failure

by Akpan Edidong
June 12, 2025
0

The Organised Private Sector (OPS) and oil marketers have called for the immediate privatization of Nigeria’s state-owned refineries following the...

Crude Oil Prices Soar as Global Supply Shortage Intensifies.

Finance Ministry Denies Collapse of $5 Billion Oil-Backed Loan Deal

by Akpan Edidong
June 12, 2025
0

The Federal Ministry of Finance has dismissed reports claiming the collapse of a proposed $5 billion crude oil-backed loan involving...

CBEX Promoters Seek Bail in Alleged $1 Billion Crypto Scam Case

by Victoria Attah
June 12, 2025
0

Three promoters of the collapsed Crypto Bridge Exchange (CBEX), implicated in an alleged $1 billion fraudulent cryptocurrency scheme, have requested...

Next Post

Implications of Declining Aid and Remittances for Low-Income African Nations

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

Federal Court Denies Access Bank’s Bid to Freeze MTN Accounts Over ₦180 Billion Dispute

June 13, 2025
Dangote Sugar appoints Yabawa Lawan as Non-Executive Director.

Arnold Ekpe Appointed Chairman of Dangote Sugar Refinery

June 13, 2025

Popular Story

  • BlackRock Joins Blockchain Platform Axoni for Equity Swap Trades

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Shocking: “Undress” An AI Tool That Unveils Digital Representations of Individuals Without Clothing

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • American Banks Brace for Earnings Season Amidst Rising Interest Rates

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Euro Area Unemployment Rate Holds Steady at 6.5% in February 2024, Eurostat Reports

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Nigeria Sees Surge in Active Bank Accounts, Reaches 219.6 Million in March 2024 – NIBSS

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
RateCaptain

RateCaptain

We bring you the most accurate in new and market data. Check our landing page for details.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Disclaimer
  • Cookie Policy
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2022 RateCaptain - All rights reserved by RateCaptain.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
  • FX Rates
  • Money Market
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Commodities
  • Corporates

Copyright © 2022 RateCaptain - All rights reserved by RateCaptain.

RateCaptain
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
?>